ADAM MOTOR COMPANY LIMITED versus MAJOR (R) WASEEM MEHMOOD BUTT
Complaints of sections 28, 33 and 27, dismissing the mutual orders, the appellant scope moved the respondents to dismiss the complaint on the basis of the limits under section 28 of the Punjab Consumer Protection Act 2005 which was rejected by the trial court. Had done. To file a claim with a user as he was required to first issue a written notice that any product or service is defective or defective or the conduct of the manufacturer or service provider is against the provisions of Punjab Consumer Protection Act 2005 Is violated. Manufacturers or service providers providing defects or damages must respond to this notice within fifteen days of receipt by the same consumer court unless the user or authority has given notice and provided proof that they are permanently available. Was provided but the manufacturer or service provider did not respond to a 30-day notice period for filing a claim by the user or A because of the reason for the process provided that the consumer court manufacturer or service Extend the deadline to file a claim for sixty days from the expiry of the warranty or guarantee period specified by the provider Fact and if no period was specified this year. The date of purchase of the product or delivery of services had to be calculated from the time the action was taken, due to no remedy against mutual orders in the Punjab Consumer Protection Act 2005, but only an appeal could be filed against it. Is. The final order was not upheld, which was dismissed under the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
