Section 42 & Ev 54 Evacuation Property and Displaced Persons Act (repealed) Act (X5 X of XIV), Article Qunun Statute of Evidence (10 of of X), Article 129 (G) Declaration and Permanent Prohibition of Prohibition of Prohibited Property Settlement, Prevention of Evidence, Prevention Settlement Authorities on 209 1976 declared that the plaintiff's property was in fact part of the property purchased by the defendant in the auction and thereafter the eviction property and the property were sold. The lawsuit and appeal filed by the plaintiff's endorsement of the laws of the household were dismissed. (Cancellation) Act, 1975, Except for the whole of the rural and urban evacuation properties kept in the provincial government by the act of law, the settlement of certain pending matters in the Assoc Property and Homelessness Act (Cancellation) Act 1975, No property was available for or the maintenance authorities were not in any way disposed to dispose of the disputed property nor was the matter in this regard such property to be disposed of by the High Court. Given, because under any of the statutory laws, there was no such institution as a Deputy Settlement Commissioner whose settlement law After the enactment, the imposing person did not present the evidence of the settlement authorities to the evidence which was to prove the fact. Controversial Documents Defendants withheld the best evidence, if any, for reasons best known to them, therefore, entitled to pass the order of High Court 209 1976 against Defendant's administration. Was not and the plaintiff will issue a transfer order in favor of the High Court. The exercise of jurisdiction over the two courts below
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
