BANK OF PUNJAB versus KHAN UNIQUE BUILDERS PVT. LTD.
The case for the recovery of the provisions of Articles 10, 9 and 3 was that the plaintiff bank had admitted its obligation to the holding bank, this record indicated that the defendant and the plaintiff company were provided with money by the plaintiff bank. Was not denied by It acknowledged its responsibility in the terms of the letter issued by him, the letter of which was not denied by the defendants on the execution or signatures of the chief executive, the difference between the amount of dispute between the parties. , And the money was claimed by the defendants of the plaintiff's bank - attempts to refuse the payment of money were most invasive, and a disclosure refusal under the law, in no way, denied. The High Court had issued an interim order against the accused for the amount jointly and severally distributed. Financial Institutions Financing (Rehabilitation) In accordance with the funds under Section 3 of the Ordinance 2001, and the amount of unconditional discounts granted to the defendants, the amount of the deduction amount \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
