O XXIII, R 1, O II, R 2, O IX, R 9, O XXI, R 10, O XXII, R 9 and Section 12 Qunun e Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts 75 and 76 Special Relief Act (I Of 1877), the reason for proceedings for the specific performance of the Section 12 suit agreement, the dismissal of the fresh suit, the Bar of Power of Attorney Skopi filed a fresh lawsuit after the former discharge of the plaintiff's position, which was dismissed It was that both sides agreed that outside the court, Waldetti's defendants had applied to withdraw their previous case, which was accepted by the plaintiff either resolving the previous case on the basis of a compromise if it existed or even. That the reason for mentioning the settlement mentioned in his request to withdraw the case was very much available to the defendants in the proceedings arising from the requisite contract when the previous case was pending due to the said date but he had O II, R 2, C In the case referred to in the PC's refusal to claim the relief bar, a new case will be withheld in respect of any part where a claimant is due to lack of part of the claim and part of the claim. Has subsequently been barred from pursuing further litigation in this regard for any particular reason. It should not be entitled to establish a new case. The plaintiffs withdrew their former suit in the sense of OXXII, R1, CPC, which would be dismissed in the event of a dismissal and eventually resolved the case. Such a withdrawal would end the litigation. And in the final case, the prosecuting attorney was not allowed to decide the fate of their right to property in the dispute but to obtain special permission from the principal for the proposed object.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015
