Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 376 and 386 of the bail, racketeering grants and extortionate case in the FIR was a school teacher who alleged that the accused was black. Mail and called her back to her house. In August, 2012, her husband was lodged with her husband on arrival from abroad, about four months after he abused her, about her computer data. Somewhere along the line, which was reported in December, 2012, the reason for such a delay for an educated woman was not properly explained by less than a school teacher, because neither her husband's consent was required nor He was a witness to the incident The final opinion of the doctor revealed that according to the victim's statement, he had been sexually assaulted five and a half months ago. Multiple intercourse was performed after the husband's record was returned showing no memo of recovery of nude images Computer data was collected at maximum set up without demand or money of any kind. Threats The two witnesses also kept the mother for a period of three months and no mention of a date and location was given. The complainant went to the accused's house to collect his computer data, until then the complainant's Was of no importance to the applicant, and according to his nude photographs the applicant's home was taken when the applicant Cr matter was considered under section 497 (2), and came under further investigation. Bail was allowed in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
