Find a Lawyer

THE ARMY WELFARE TRUST TRADING AS NIZAMPUR CEMENT PLANT versus SONERI BANK LIMITED

Section 9 Banking Court Jurisdiction Over Multiple Claims The plaintiff company filed a lawsuit against the bank, which included various claims based on contractual obligations and injurious proceedings that justified their financial affairs (recovery of financial matters) ordinance. Can be resolved under 2001, which was between consumer and financial affairs, with regard to finance and also on the basis that no obligation was fulfilled, only two under financial institutions (restoration of finance) ordinance 2001 Claims can be prosecuted, while the remaining claims cannot be brought before the Banking Court High Court. Yes. Plaintiffs dismissed claims that were not sustained under the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance 2001; the suit filed by the plaintiff was retained accordingly.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• NAZAR HUSSAIN v. State 2014 PCrLJ 435
• Rana NAVEED AHMAD KHAN v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary LG and CD 2014 PLD 436
• KHAN MUHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD AZAM 2014 CLC 438
• Miss Syeda ANAM ILYAS v. Dr. HAROON RASHID 2014 PLD 439
• Ch. MUHAMMAD SALEEM v. DIRECTOR-GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 2014 CLC 445
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. Malik REHMAT ULLAH 2014 MLD 451
• Dr. SALMAN KAZMI v. SECRETARY CABINET DIVISION 2014 PLD 451
• MUHAMMAD IMRAN v. State 2014 PCrLJ 456

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

best advocate from Daska lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes