Section 12 law does not mention thumb impressions or its executive signatures in other agreements, except for the first contract that sells suits for specific performance of this evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 17, 79 and 129 (g). And even though he did not even include his name, such agreements were not binding on the defendant. Only one minor witness of the contract of sale was presented and the other was withheld. Was responsible for proving the implementation of a contract to sell the product from, but withheld the same pattern. The defendant was not disclosed for payment of arrears. The best evidence was withheld, and the plaintiff will be indicted that if such evidence was presented, he would also support his version. And the defendant was not paid any more money and there were new agreements. On execution of his execution the ons edit was rejected
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
