ARQAM EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY versus DAR-E-ARQAM SCHOOL
Sections 17, 14 and 114 were established in 1992, after which the appellant established a school with the same name in 1993, in which the applicant applied for trademark registration. Permission was granted, and the appellant's opposition requests were rejected by the registrar trademarks on the correction requests filed by the respondents, and the fact is that the appellant's dispatches had the same name. Responding school was registered in the year 1992 before the establishment of the school, in the present case, in this case it was whether there was any Muscle was not. Each party has a dispute over the use of the common name by the other party and, if so, the risk of that. And second, the dispute arose as to which party in the public party has very large maps to benefit from such standing, reputation and business profile to claim exclusive use, if not the name of the High Court in question. Has observed that the parties to the above points should respond to the competing claims, and the Registrar Trademarks have been instructed to record evidence on the above points of fact and to register exclusive use and trademarks on the parties' claims. Give me my information Within three months the appeal was resolved, according to \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
