The Banking Court against the applicants for the certified copies of 21 12 2005 against the termination of the delay, the time limit for appeal for section 5 and 12 certified copy, section 5 and 12 certified copy Decision made in 2005, copies were made on 1. 2 were obtained on 2006 and 27 4 2006, while the appeal was filed on 16 5 2006. The defendants objected to the request that no date was provided for the delivery of the copy by the copying agency, therefore, the only time to obtain copies was to exclude the time limit. The plaintiff's bank held that the provisions of the Limitation Act, 1908 did not apply to proceedings under the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance, 2001. For the purposes of the computing period of demarcation, the requirement for time to be excluded was considered to be the time interval between the day on which the transcript was applied and the actual time the copy was made Was notified about the copy agency on the day the copy will be ready for delivery There is a consensus that no date for the delivery of copies was made to the defendants, the copy agency stamp did not ? Reveal when the application for obtaining certified copies was made or when the certified copies were prepared or what was the delivery date to the defendants only on the date on which the stamp appeared. Date was the required date to produce certified copies in the required absence. The High Court relied on the application of the dates raised by the defendants in which F
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
