Section 302, 148 and 149 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 (2A) Qatil Omar, Appeal Against the Evidence of Evidence Going to Its Roots It has been revealed that, in the case of the respondents / accused None of them had committed the crime, but two others are the complainant's statements, cannot be taken as a fact of the gospel without free association. The complainant's guest, who arrived at the complainant's house to attend the marriage ceremony, was a freelance witness, but was not presented during the trial in support of the prosecutor's version, but he did not know the reasons. The prosecutor's squad site plan, which was known to have been abandoned, was controversial with the stand, the complaint reported by the complainant in relation to the distance between the suspect and him. The accused remained on physical remand for the entire period, but nothing was recovered from their possession, not only the perpetrators were found innocent during the ongoing investigation, but the Investigation Officer prepared a discharge report in this regard. In which the trial court did not compile. Misinterpretation or non-reading of the evidence available on the record was conclusive and reasonable in the conclusion obtained by the trial court, which did not require any interference by the High Court Counsel for the appellant / complainant; Was unable to identify evidence, which required a person to be sentenced. The entire prosecution for the death penalty was full of speculation, accusations and doubts that could not be the basis for the murder. And when the vacuum of evil
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
