Find a Lawyer

MEHMOOD TEXTILE MILLS LTD. versus MULTAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY (MEPCO) THROUGH C.E.O.

Article 199 Constitution Petitioner Electrical Power Company Due to Objection to Overpayment Rakesh Scope Petitioner / Electric Supply Company Suppliers Provided Electricity Under Agreement With Multan Electric Power Company (MEPCO) But Amount Due To Power Supply / Payment was not due The issued Mepco informed the applicant / electric supplier that its payment was withheld due to audit objections. The applicant / electricity supplier was of the view that the audit object is an internal matter of MEPCO and the payment cannot be ruled out on the basis of the revised power generation, the contract obligated to pay against the Mepco invoice. Yes, the respondent / MEPCO submitted for the relevant months acknowledged that the payment was withheld due to the audit objection, which was a matter between Mepco and its audit department which was heard by the High Court. Was directed to release for a long time. Constitutional petition accepted for payment of petitioner / electricity supplier along with press

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• TAHIR ABBAS v. State 2014 YLR 1242
• ABDUL SATTAR v. MUHAMMAD RAFI 2014 MLD 1249
• SHEHRIYAR ALAM v. JUDGE, SPECIAL COURT (OFFENCES IN RESPECT OF BANKS) PUNJAB, LAHORE 2014 PCrLJ 1252
• NIAGARA MILLS (PVT.) LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary (Revenue Division), Federation Board of Revenue 2014 CLD 1253
• TAHIRA YASMIN v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB 2014 PLC(CS) 1256
• MUHAMMAD SALEEM v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Administrator Town Municipal Administration, District Gujranwala 2014 CLC 1259
• JAMES EMMANUEL v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Statistics Division, Islamabad 2014 PLC(CS) 1264
• TALIB HUSSAIN v. AZMAT ALI 2014 YLR 1266

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

property advocate from Khairpur Nathan Shah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes