Find a Lawyer

GHULAM SARWAR KHAN versus TARIQ KHATTAK

In section 24 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), Judge 54 applied for the transfer of the suit to the plaintiff scope plaintiff, which was dismissed by the district judge, for the transfer of a permanent injunction, the plaintiff's argument was that Had lost confidence in the case. Because the court was gentle in favor of the defendant. Legal Case The plaintiff wanted to delay the case and instead of presenting evidence he was filing various petitions, no matter of discretion was found by the district judge by the district judge. And the only case in which management and assignment of affairs was made was that the interference of its functions on the basis of weakness would weaken the confidence of the lower judiciary, and the jurisdiction in favor of any litigation which misused the practice of law. What was there could not be used.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• TAHIRA YASMIN v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB 2014 PLC(CS) 1256
• MUHAMMAD SALEEM v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Administrator Town Municipal Administration, District Gujranwala 2014 CLC 1259
• JAMES EMMANUEL v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Statistics Division, Islamabad 2014 PLC(CS) 1264
• TALIB HUSSAIN v. AZMAT ALI 2014 YLR 1266
• Mst. FARHANA NAZ v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2014 PLC(CS) 1270
• Syed HAROON SULTAN BOKHARI v. Syeda MUBARAK FATIMA 2014 CLC 1270
• MUHAMMAD SHAHID v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1273
• ACRO DEVELOPERS (PVT.) LTD. v. BANK OF PUNJAB through Branch Manager 2014 CLD 1275

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

family advocate from Kasur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes