Articles 302 (b), 324 and 34 Qutal Amad, attempting to compel Qatil-e-Amal, the definition of evidence, usually sentenced, was immediately named in the FIR immediately registered with the culprits, in which the accused was convicted. The specific attribute of the fatal injury to the dispersion, legally verified by a post-mortem report. The prosecution's witnesses, who were natural witnesses, fully support the account. The prosecution's witnesses provided a reasonable and probable cause for their presence at that time and place. Their testimony was proven through medical evidence, both of the prosecution's witnesses were subjected to cross-examination for a long time, but their credibility could not be shaken, as they not only supported each other, but They, too, agree on all the material details of the prosecution's case. As a witness, the credibility of the rest of the evidence will not be lost; if this builds confidence, no crime was spared from the incident, and the recovered rifle recovered at the indictment of the accused did not appear. The trial court, which assisted in the recovery of the evidence, was unforgettable, which could not be used as a piece of evidence and was not targeted in the account. This was not enough to directly dispose of the prosecution's version, as the impairment of the stimulus or the apparent absence of the stimulus may not be useful to the defendants, when the invisible ocular evidence was available, the prosecution prosecuted the accused. Qatal was able to prove Um's charge. Medical evidence, through an ocular account of an unidentified character
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
