Section 9 and 10 re-possession of the vehicle on lease by the bank The plaintiff / user of the Banking Court filed a case for declaration and permanent injunction against the bank for re-occupation of the leased vehicle and the said vehicle The suit was disposed of because of a request to return. The plaintiff agreed that he was willing to pay the installments and, under the payment of installments and the re-occupation fee, the defendant bank was instructed to return the goods which would comply with the procedures laid down by the financial institutions. The lawful banking court erred in ignoring the law. Financial Affairs) Ordinance, 2001 Banking Court, in the present case, failed to give the defendant an opportunity to defend his case under section 10 of the preliminary leave to defend the application, this statement by the plaintiff / client It was alleged that these actions were illegal and illegal for the defense bank to own a vehicle. To instruct the bank to present a credible and credible statement of accounts. It is a permanent order that the re-occupied vehicle should not be auctioned and the possession of the re-occupied vehicle be handed over to the claimant. On the basis of the injunction, the banking court accepted the claimant's statement that he was in breach of certain installments, and The banking court granted the final relief to the plaintiff after providing the opportunity to file his leave to defend the application under section 10 of the Ordinance Banking Court, therefore, the banking court granted a request under section 10 of the ordinance banking court. Provided final relief to the plaintiff. For example, the defendant should be granted leave to defend the case or not because the law
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
