Find a Lawyer

STANDARD CHARTERED BANK (PAKISTAN) LIMITED versus ARSHAD ALI

Section 9 and 22 Suit for Recovery of Bank Loan Excluded for Illegal Prosecution The wrong date of litigation, the notice of suit filed by the plaintiff bank was dismissed for illegal prosecution and the bank restated on this application Requested that its clerk note the wrong date. At the time of the lawyer's dismissal of the case at 3pm, only the defendant's lawyer's clerk was marked for the defendants, the plaintiff's bank lawyer's diary pages revealed that the lawyer's diary I have noted this case incorrectly, no denial of affidavits was ever brought along with the record. Appeal for restoration of the case The High Court set aside the order passed by the Banking Court and referred the case to the Banking Court for a merit decision.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• Professor Syed KHURSHID ALAM v. Ch. MUHAMMAD ASLAM 2014 CLC 188
• Mst. SHAMA TALIB v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, RAWALPINDI 2014 PLD 189
• SHAHID v. State 2014 MLD 190
• MUNIR AHMAD v. MUHAMMAD RAMZAN SHEIKH 2014 YLR 191
• Sardar ALI MUHAMMAD KHAN v. MUHAMMAD AYYUB 2014 CLD 193
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. State 2014 PLD 194
• COCA-COLA BEVERAGES PAKISTAN LIMITED v. ASHIQ ALI 2014 PLD 196
• The BANK OF PUNJAB v. Malik UMER FAROOQ 2014 CLD 198

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

list of advocates from Kakul lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes