SYED GHULAM ABBAS BOKHARI versus RAJA MUSHTAQ AHMAD
Sections 119, 302, 324 and 342 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (a) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 417 (2A) concealed the design of public servants to commit the crime. It is his duty to stop. Assassination attempt; extortion; false imprisonment; prosecution for defining appellate evidence against acquittal of terrorist acts by prisoners during the prison visit. The resulting assassination attack left twelve (12) judicial officers and others hostage in the prison premises, after which police took action. An operation, which resulted in the death of four (4) judicial officers and injuring several others. The trial court acquitted the accused, including the Deputy Inspector General of Police, who gave orders for the operation. Police personnel involved in the operation were acquitted. The jail superintendent, and a surgeon who treated one of the judicial officers, who later went undiagnosed with wounds, complained to the complainant that the police operation was hurried on the orders of the Deputy Inspector General of Police. , And ignored the instructions of the relevant authorities. The operation that the police conducted was not a rescue operation but a murder. The assassination attack on the judicial officers was the result of a conspiracy by the superintendent jail and jail staff, and a surgeon who treated one of the deceased judicial officers did not deliberately provide appropriate medical assistance. The shoulders of the jail authorities were slaughtered, but with a delay of two days, the complainant made this statement through his additional statement.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
