Section 497 (2) of the Contempt of the Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 34 of the Crusader, the joint intention to guarantee, further investigation, grant that in this case kara larkara nature is commanding in nature, and the co-accused in the same case. While processing. Killed the victim, was that a question that could not be fixed at the bail stage because the alleged evidence required by the accused was really needed and even then, there was evidence on which May be flogged and examined by the court. Appropriate action, in the present case, was merely charged with raising the "laurels" for the murder of the victim, and in that regard, he did not charge the victim's FIR in any way, no disclosure. Was that the suspect was armed with someone. In the relevant time the matter of the accused came under the purview of Section 497 (2), the PC accused was admitted to bail, under circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014