Sections 2 (c), 2 (d), 2 (f), 5, 7, 9 and 22 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), along with provisions of Articles 42 and 55, were mandatory as required. ? The claim filed by the appellant before the Banking Court that he is anonymous owner of the Development Growth Certificate purchased in the name of his mother and grandfather and claiming that he is the original owner and holder of the Deposit Growth Certificate. Receive the entire amount of the certificate with markup / interest, and a directive against the bank that the payment banking court has observed to deal with the issue that the certificate is being claimed by the appellant. Name The deceased's relatives, therefore, must either obtain a certificate of succession in connection with the Deposit Growth Certificate or may demand a declaration from the court of competent jurisdiction on the basis that the appellant is anonymous. These certificates are satisfied with the order of the Banking Court, the appellant filed an appeal before the High Court stating that the appellant's position was that he was under the jurisdiction of the Banking Court under Section 7 of the Ordinance, therefore, it was an unwanted order. Against the law, the appellant further argued that he initially filed a case before the civil court for a declaratory relief, but the plaintiff returned and the appellant returned to the banking court bank after the plaintiff's return. It is sued that there is no such fact until the return of the plaintiff from the plaintiff or the appeal filed against the order of the civil court. This was mentioned in the Plaintiff before the Banking Court, however, the first time the Appellant Bank filed such a petition with the Appellant.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
