Sections 409, 420, 468 and 471 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (Second of 1947), Section 5 Criminal Code (V9 1898), Crimes Violations of Sections 221, 342, 364 and 537, fraud, fraud and illegality As evidence of happiness, the evidence raised by the accused was that neither the accused was properly settled, nor was there any witness against them in the statement under Section 342, CR PC. Was given and the evidence was not recorded in accordance with the law. But the accused was required, as well as the law, to accuse each person of any fact that caused the criminal action against him in respect of the provisions under which he could be prosecuted. That they should not be charged in accordance with the actions taken. And under the preventive provisions, it is alleged that he was treated unfairly, his failure certificate was an essential requirement of the law, when the trial court did not register the evidence itself. The documentary evidence was jointly contested, which clash showed that all the documentary evidence available on record was contested by each of the accused, regardless of whether the document belonged to the accused or not. Errors were identified by but were in fact irregularities of the code. Trials that were treatable and could be prosecuted by the trial court when they concluded that the defects were treatable irregularities and that the offenses were unlawful proceedings, the trial by the DeNauvo Trial High Court. There is no other way but to send it to court
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
