Section 11 and 17 of the Law Testimony (10 of 1984), Article 129 (g) as a rule of the court, the applicants believed that the controversial award was the result of corruption and the arbitrator traveled beyond his authority. And as a rule, the arbitral parties appointed by the arbitrator to resolve the dispute in relation to the agricultural property had declared to the arbitrator that the deceased was not to be resolved by a Sunni sect as there was no dispute on the matter. Thereafter the arbitrator announced his award after more than three years of interim and do not decide the dispute There was a trip beyond that which the Revenue authorities confirmed to the deceased as Shiite, and it is still intact and the defendant was declared the legal heir of the victim's dispute and not only the revenue. Decision has been made about the death squad by the courts but also by the deceased. Civil court applicants did not present contractual testimony for appointment of arbitrator nor arbitration was presented in the witness box. The best evidence was withheld because they were known and had to be withheld and mediated by the arbitrator. There was no record of the action taken. It was submitted before the court that the arbitration proceedings were considered sacred and the Holiness was called but the arbitrator did not consider his jurisdiction while awarding the arbitrator did not judge the dispute fairly and equitably. Committed mismanagement. The matter is notably the applicants of any kind of error or non-invasive decision
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
