Section 5 evidence5 Definition of Abduction and Evidence for Abduction Revenge The benefit of the doubt was that the accused was acquitted by the trial court on the same evidence, saying that the affidavit was not challenged, either by the complaining party, or State-only evidence is available; the alleged abductor never escaped to court after the arrest of the accused, and no identification parade was held, so that after the arrest of the accused Can be proved. The file to attach the accused, except the FIR, was not recovered from the custody of the accused, nor was the ransom money set up to pass to the accused and the complainant's claim That the accused had his hand. Matters, without positive efforts by him to support her, did not yield any results. The complainant made a voluntary statement that increased the crime with the advertising suspects in order to maintain a happy relationship between them. There were no cases of abduction or abduction, and the components of the crime against the accused were not attracted in this case while the benefit of the suspect has been enhanced in the case of the accused, the facts and circumstances of the case, the accused. Was found to be entitled to a bad sentence and the conviction filed by the trial court against the accused was set aside, and Was acquitted of all the charges leveled and it was not free, conditions
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
