SUMARA UMAR AWAN versus CHANCELLOR GOMAL UNIVERSITY, D.I. KHAN
Article 199 Constitutional Application Civil Service Appointment Not Included in Services by Successful Candidates Effect of Appointment of Runner Up Candidate (Serial No.2) Applied for the post of Game Supervisor Merit Based on Scope Petitioner Test and Interview Petitioner Was created. The candidate on the merit list in Serial No.2 had shown in Serial No.1 that the service was not joined. The applicant had claimed himself to be on the merit list and claimed the appointment. Authorities denied appointment of the candidate, saying that the selection made in connection with the appointment of a candidate who appears in the top of Serial No.1 if not in the list is not eligible for appointment to the next candidate. Will be created as the merit list expires, legitimate successful candidate, does not join the taper and the seat is vacated Who deserves it. According to the waiting list, the next candidate could be offered the post and could not wait for it and the department had to consider running the post for the post against the runner candidate who was required in the general course. On the one hand it will frustrate the method adopted to advertise on the hectic drill and, on the other hand, will prevent the successful candidate from appearing in serial number 2. The department was directed to appoint the applicant, in whose favor a constitutional right was obtained, in which case constitutional application was allowed
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
