The definition of the evidence showed that the incident took place in the house of the accused in the document, as per the section 302 (b) and 337f (vi) murders, which led to the arrest of any person. Not contradicted, the site's plan and recovery memo proved, in addition to the FIR that relied on their contents, the statement of the prosecutor's witness sought further help from the suspect's involvement, which led to his dismissal. That is, the deceased traveled with him, and the next morning he heard that another factor had killed the creditor. The perpetrator of the crime in the commission of this crime was his fugitive, who recovered the body from the house, though did not link the housekeeper to the house. A commission of e-crime, but in the present case, it was not only the recovery of the body from his house, but also that his sister-in-law was injured in the shootings, the prosecution succeeded in punishing the culprits from the house. Was sentenced as. And the trial court sentenced
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
