Section 1 561A Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965 of XX), Section 13 The prosecution presented three witnesses who were all policemen, and other witnesses were unnecessary in order to abolish the order for possessing illegal weapons. Because of the abandoned cows populated the area where the residents were present, but none of the private persons was called to witness the recovery memo, the police officer admitted that he could not name anyone who had Refused to record the statement, or even to testify in the recovery memo, that the police officer also admitted that he did not ask the accused Whether the alleged weapons were licensed or not, all operations by the police officer were carried out at the police station, the recovery from the alleged suspects could not be substantiated by the evidence, the investigating officer recovered the Kalashnikovs Memo was not prepared. And the possibility of making false accusations of the accused in the rounds could not be ruled out, since the prosecution's case was not curable, in this case the innocent person could not be linked to the commission of the crime, despite the release of millions The two courts below failed to interpret the evidence, and yet it was wrongly convicted and sentenced. No case was filed against the accused and his sanction was not accepted and the decision passed by the lower courts was set aside and the accused was acquitted of the charges leveled against him, and The bail was released from the obligation of the surety bond.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
