Clauses 302, 324, 337A, 337F and 337A, the cause of death, the heirs of the deceased Jaffa, the defendant for the definition of martyrdom or the accused for the specific role of effective firing on the injured. Only the complaining party was accused of firing a general claim that the suspects had started shooting indiscriminately at eyewitnesses. And said that because of the shootings, the victim was targeted and killed, and the complainant and others were injured, but none of them knew about the witness as a result of the fire. Who has died and the injured can benefit from a serious mistake. Part of the prosecution will go in favor of the accused. And it would not be safe to make capital accusations, the prosecution's testimony testified, was contradictory to each other, and they did not state any specific or separate testimony attributed to the defendant for any particular role, Retract the confessional statements of the accused. Do little to advance the prosecution's case, because it did not meet the legal threshold of authenticity as a true, voluntary and unjust accuser, only firing on the complaining party in retaliation, While the "site plan" was ready at this point. The complainant stated that no vacancy was recovered on the spot, which is why the complaining party was stated to be present, in which the confessional statements of the accused persons, which were not proved with other evidence. Security cannot be specified. After the accused committed the crime before the magistrate, handed it over to the police,
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
