Find a Lawyer

CHAMAN ZADA versus SHAH ZEB

Article 13 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application jurisdiction High Court jurisdictional withdrawal request Under the special mark of constitutional jurisdiction, finding out the harmony of the two courts was to promote justice and wrong constitutional right in favor of the person coming to court. The option could not be used. With dirty hands to satisfy greedy and greedy seizures, the magistrate's jurisdiction was not open to question the present results in a constitutional jurisdiction after considering the material on record, the constitutional application dismissed. Go

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014

• ABDUL BARI v. DIRECTOR, LIVESTOCK, DAIRY DEVELOPMENT, FATA 2014 PLD 132
• SAEED AHMAD v. State 2014 PCrLJ 133
• KHUDA BAKHSH v. FAZALUR REHMAN 2014 YLR 139
• GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. ABDULLAH 2014 MLD 141
• BAKHTIAR KHAN v. QASIM JAN 2014 YLR 154
• Qazi MUHAMMAD YOUSAF v. State 2014 PCrLJ 155
• ISLAM UD DIN v. ABDUL MAJEED 2014 MLD 155
• MUHAMMAD SHERAZ v. CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 2014 PLD 170

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2014 →

famous lower court advocate from Ghazi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes