ABDUL BARI versus DIRECTOR, LIVESTOCK, DAIRY DEVELOPMENT, FATA
Arts 246, 247 and 199 The Frontier Crimes Regulation (III of 1901), the forthcoming constitutional petition, advises parliament through the judiciary executive advising policy / people belonging to FATA to the Constitutionally Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA). Issue of policy changes / amendments made by the executive and parliament in relation to the denial of basic rights to / FATA The question is whether to ensure that the people of FATA have a legal and judicial forum What actions did the executive and parliament take? Implementing and enforcing their fundamental rights was a "matter of policy" and should therefore be best placed on the wisdom and judgment of the other two organs (i.e., the executive and the legislature), so as to encompass the judiciary. Any advice from the source. The specific steps involved would mean losing its significance and turning it into a "direction", if the parliament was made through an executive. The constitutional request was dealt with after the emotion was removed as per the request of the Constitution. r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
