Find a Lawyer

SAEED AHMAD versus STATE

Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302 murder EM bail, denied the deep appreciation of the evidence that he was charged with single-entry wound and any kind of dead body. No black or stain marks on. The matter was to be taken up temporarily and avoided with deep appreciation of the evidence that the two offenses were acquitted by chance and that the combination of the two pistols recovered from the possession of the accused was a reasonable basis for the conviction. The accused are the perpetrators of the crime. The death sentence was to look for a conviction or the absence of markers when such a case would appear before the trial court as it requires deep appreciation, which the courts could not take bail at the bail-out stage.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014

• Mst. RIFFAT YASMEEN v. HASSAN DIN 2014 CLC 126
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM alias MUHAMMAD IKRAM v. State 2014 MLD 127
• MIAN KHAN v. State 2014 PLD 127
• ABDUL BARI v. DIRECTOR, LIVESTOCK, DAIRY DEVELOPMENT, FATA 2014 PLD 132
• KHUDA BAKHSH v. FAZALUR REHMAN 2014 YLR 139
• GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. ABDULLAH 2014 MLD 141
• CHAMAN ZADA v. SHAH ZEB 2014 CLC 151
• BAKHTIAR KHAN v. QASIM JAN 2014 YLR 154

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2014 →

lawer from fb area from Wan Radha Ram lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes