Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

QAZI MUHAMMAD YOUSAF versus STATE


Section 1 561 A Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 379, 408 and 411 of theft, criminal breach of trust by the servant, and termination of the FIR's identity by the defendant at trial on receiving stolen property. The case was brought to trial by a court of competent jurisdiction and the court had fixed the date of the hearing, then the proper course was to bring the case under the relevant law. Applicable, such practice could be done at any time before being charged. Without such remedy, reaching the High Court directly to abolish the FIR under Section 6161A, CRPC, was beyond the jurisdiction of Section Section 616161A to facilitate the High Court. The CRPC would be just as unusual. Cases and circumstances and the same case was not the High Court accused in exercising the jurisdiction under Section 561A, CRPC, denied the termination of the FIRP.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Haveli Lakha lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.