Find a Lawyer

ISLAM UD DIN versus ABDUL MAJEED

Section 114 and the AXLVII Review Scope Review Petition were to be entertained and it was decided to correct an error or omission which is a court proceeding which is contrary to the provisions of the law or is completely insulting to the evidence. After reviewing a decision in this case, a decision needs to be corrected for an error that needs to be easily understood and understood, and an assessment of what could lead to injustice cannot be equivalent to a re-hearing of a case. ?

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014

• GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. ABDULLAH 2014 MLD 141
• CHAMAN ZADA v. SHAH ZEB 2014 CLC 151
• BAKHTIAR KHAN v. QASIM JAN 2014 YLR 154
• Qazi MUHAMMAD YOUSAF v. State 2014 PCrLJ 155
• MUHAMMAD SHERAZ v. CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 2014 PLD 170
• HAMAYUN v. D.C.O., KOHAT 2014 PCrLJ 173
• ABU BAKAR v. Mst. KHAYBER JAN 2014 YLR 178
• MANAGING DIRECTOR, BANK OF KHYBER v. KARIM GUL 2014 PLC 183

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2014 →

online advocate from Arifwala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes