A. XXXVII, the Rr 1 and 2 suit for the collection of checks on the basis of the claim by the respondent that one of the banks was received after the check date and said that the check could not be made to the extent. The defendant admitted that despite the arbitration process and the plaintiff's failure to mention it, the defendant's admission made it clear that there was mediation between the parties and that the plaintiff's check in favor of the plaintiff Were issued as alleged by the defendant in a written statement and no evidence was presented on it, in the absence of a relationship between the parties and the amount of money in the form of loan or investment. There was no positive evidence in the record for the exchange. On the contrary, the preliminary idea based on the instrumental issues of the case was that they were made, made, or accepted for consideration. Such documents were either denied or substantiated, This would put the burden on the maker and the mere refusal could not excuse the defendant from being excluded, the burden was acknowledged by the defendant and the plaintiff was entitled to a discount to the extent that it was checked except for the claim. Appeals for postponement of bank postponed post-date check were dropped
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
