Sections 4 and 5 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), section 41 law on evidence (10 of 1984), arts 77, 79, 102, 117 and 118 civil procedure code (VV 1908), section 79, O XXVII and OI, R 10 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Secondary Evidence for Non-Registration Procedure Notice to Offer Occupancy Affiliation Proprietary Rights burden Plaintiffs sued for declaration that they were suits property owners Are. The defendant was that he had purchased the suit land through an unregistered action suit which was simultaneously proved to be valid, neither the original act was exhibited nor the square and certified witnesses were presented to the trial court and The plaintiff did not give any notice in relation to presenting the secondary evidence. Unregistered proceedings, nor did he obtain any permission to prove the same burden on defendant to prove that he had purchased the property from a legitimate owner and trade. His displeasure, however, failed to prove that the plaintiff paid the rent due to illegal occupation and could not be allowed to raise a contradictory application in connection with the occupation of the land without obtaining proprietary rights. The registered process failed to prove that the merger of the acquisition of property rights on the ground of the occupation of the suit for purchase of the land was declared against Islam and no such application was available to anyone after 1990. The possession of the suit land can be traced to this. A record of the revenue but neither the defendant nor the trial court tried to present the measles kidney to Jambandi during the record and was exhibited during the trial. The defendant did
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
