Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IBRAR versus STATE

Regarding section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 336 and 34 of the Confession Guarantee, the grant of a further investigation alleges that the wounds on the injured lips and mouth of the mouth occurred. After placing both reports, be determined during the trial, as the Medical Legal Report and the Dentist Surgeon's report in section 49 have been considered in section 497 (2) with an ocular account, CRPC has been charged to the accused. Bail was admitted, in the circumstances \ r \ n

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014

• ABDUL MAJEED CHAUDHRY v. ABDUL HAKEEM SHAH 2014 CLC 473
• Mst. RIAZ BIBI v. MUHAMMAD RIAZ 2014 PCrLJ 475
• AMJAD KHAN v. WAFAQI MOHTASIB (OMBUDSMAN)\' SECRETARIAT through Secretary, Islamabad 2014 PLC(CS) 476
• SHAFQAT REHMAN v. Mst. MAHJABEN 2014 MLD 481
• GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA v. MUHAMMAD ANWAR KHAN 2014 YLR 485
• HABIB ULLAH v. MUHAMMAD IQBAL KHAN 2014 CLC 489
• SHAH ZAIB v. State 2014 PCrLJ 494
• MEHARBAN v. AJAB NOOR 2014 YLR 500

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2014 →

patent advocate from Mandi Bahauddin lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes