Section 27 Defamation of Defective Investigative Evidence Defendant made some errors, and when those errors were identified, he was unable to properly answer the same validity lapses in the trial that led to the trial court. Referred, could not be attributed to the accused only, The record of this case was silent. Regarding the fact that the errors cited were the result of bad faith, or that nothing was available for any external considerations that were alleged to have been intentional, as an Investigation Officer. And acted illegally, without relying; and he acted in breach of his duty, all the details were given in front of the court through the accused, and the statement of the accused along with all the documents. Didn't understand and admired it, and the court's results came out. Under the circumstances, a felony charge against the accused was suspected, the accused could not be punished or punished, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
