Sue, 42, Su Declaration and Su 55 Sue, Permanent and Compulsory Order Gift; Was that they were given this land under the question of the plaintiffs. His ancestors claimed as a serial by the then-owned cattle body that both suits had been consolidated as his property and were dismissed simultaneously. For more than a century, the plaintiffs had paid the plaintiffs for their services and they were paying and building the land revenue by the defendants in questions about the services offered by the defendants. Was. The donor was of a good mind and was able to waste his property through a gift donor. The person who gave the property to the person who served him, both died, could not be canceled by gift gifting as the land given according to the customs of the heritage area after the donor's death. But Siri had the same value as the gift land could not be returned / reclaimed as given for the services rendered and not the rights of the plaintiff to deny slavery for future works / actions to bring the slaves back. Defendants were deprived of their rights to cancel Serie. Both the courts below failed to appreciate the facts and evidence. Mr. MC was getting was causing me to read and not read the claimants and defendants in the suit was rejected amendments were dealt with accordingly
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
