Article 2 (d) and 13 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), O. VIII, R11 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Petitional Right-Deviation, Extension Court Did Not Take Up, Reject Wendes' Jurisdiction On request of the limitation but his application was rejected by the trial court lower appellate court in exercising the amended jurisdiction on the ground that the change in question was based on a decree, hence section 2 of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa pre-emption act. (D) the case was withheld. 1987 The accuracy of the vendor's application was specifically at the threshold and there was no question of retention, the sale exclusion clause was neither aggravating in the application nor in the written statement, so the amendment The court had no jurisdiction to go so far as to reject it. The transfer of the lawsuit filed by the pre-emptor in question was affirmed on the basis of the injunction in the suit, which was not money lacking. e, so it did not fall within the jurisdiction of the Constitution, except Section 2 (d) (ii) of the Pre-Impression Act of 1987, nor did it, within the scope of the order referred to the High Court, exercise of constitutional jurisdiction. Has come, the order passed by the lower appellate court is not allowed to allow the case to be reinstated.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
