Effect Vehicles seized under section 6A, A3503 and vehicle failure of state vehicle failure to establish vehicle50 Superdrive vehicles were seized by police under section 3 under & 5050 possession, as requested by CCPC The passenger who was driving the vehicle failed to produce. Police registered a case against the applicant on valid documents relating to his ownership, and after the trial ended, he was acquitted of the charge but The underwriting vehicle was confiscated to the State Petitioner for consideration that the clear buyer of the vehicle was a stampede / sale deed, so he was transferred to the same. It should be entrusted to tgy. During the investigation of the case, the applicant failed to present the person to whom he allegedly purchased the vehicle, and the stamp dealer, script and other minor witnesses also reported in the forensic science lab's cell deed report The chassis number of the vehicles recovered was tampered with, which L Peter did not provide any plausible explanation or reliable evidence but the vehicle registration book was not sent to the relevant Motor Registration Authority, however, the authority said. Did not issue the same, no open transfer letter or any other valid ten in the original entry book or car Avez not. The applicant's name was present, therefore, the vehicle was properly confiscated by the state and the following courts were justified in dismissing the applicant's request for return of the vehicle, under which the petition was dismissed.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
