Find a Lawyer

SALYAR versus AMJID ALI

AXX, R 5 and O XLI, R 31 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 54 Permanent Order for Trial Trial Trial Summary and no slip of the matter has been discussed in the slip nor is there any Case filed. The court was required to record the outcome or decision for each issue with reasons. The trial court was not bound by the trial court to dismiss the dispute in light of the parties' requests for facts regarding the ownership of the suit property. The appellate court was also obliged to cover all disputes by declaring the matter as a court of fact and ruling the matter. The trial was remanded to the trial court, which directed the plaintiff to settle an additional issue regarding property ownership and provide opportunity for both. The review was accepted on the condition of incorporating the parties' evidence and then deciding the case according to the law.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014

• Mst. SHAFEEN AKHTAR v. Malik MUMRAIZ 2014 PCrLJ 1415
• SAEED AKBAR KHAN v. Mst. AMIR MAI 2014 CLC 1415
• FARMAN ALI v. ANAR GUL 2014 YLR 1424
• INAMULLAH v. QUDRATULLAH alias QUDRATI 2014 MLD 1425
• AHMAD NAWAZ v. RABNAWAZ 2014 YLR 1441
• SAFDAR ALI v. MUHAMMAD KHAN 2014 MLD 1445
• SARGAND v. The STATE through Additional Advocate General 2014 MLD 1464
• IFTEKHAR ALI v. State 2014 YLR 1464

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2014 →

immigration advocates email from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes