Section 514 confiscation charges have been charged for the purpose and purpose of issuing notices to the detainees for which the applicants are standing on bail, failing to appear in the trial court when they were summoned, the court presented the accused. Before proceeding, proceedings against its petitions / guarantees. When he went abroad in connection with the provision of bread, the court took action against the applicants and fined them Rs 100,000 each as a bond penalty, which they submitted to the court and The trial court did not end. Legal and rational, as the non-submission or non-submission of the accused was beyond the control of the applicants, in view of the various sanctions imposed by foreign masters on Pakistanis abroad, the orders passed by the courts under Section 51414 Not based on reasonable interpretation, the CC Petitioners continued their efforts to present the accused to the court and were successful in their first attempt to present the accused before the trial court, which found itself in a trial court Surrendered in front of him and was on pre-arrest bail. The purpose was to make the accused available to the trial court, so that he could be brought to justice. Accused that he appeared in court himself, the order to seize the bond would not be appropriate, the accused was not deliberately or intentionally escaped from the court, but the accused for his livelihood was from Pakistan. Went abroad for employment, and may have been a foreign exchange worker for the country.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
