Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus MUHAMMAD YOUSAF

For the termination of the section 13 & pre-13 case, Shafi Shariq scope, the jurisdiction and the right of appeal court found that the parties due to the distribution of different parts of the relevant hat case in some particular way (related risk). Shafiq Sharif has no rights. On the accuracy of the District Council, the \ Khas \ owned by Khas Val was a non-realty property in which the parties were co-owners \ Khata till the mate and the actual distribution of the shares between the partners will remain co-owner until the appellate court wrongly. Found that the plaintiff and defendant had no right to dispute on the disputed property by interfering with the tribunal in the possession of the district council decision of the trial court. \ n

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014

• ISLAM BADSHAH v. State 2014 MLD 1806
• HAZRAT ISA v. GUL AMIN 2014 MLD 1820
• A.A. ASSOCIATES through Muhammad Nawab Khan v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 2014 MLD 1835
• SHAH BAHADAR v. SHERIN BAHADAR 2014 YLR 1855
• ALLAH DAD v. State 2014 YLR 1900
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE v. SANA ALUMINUM INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. 2014 PTD 1931
• JEHANZEB v. MUHAMMAD ISRAR 2014 YLR 1939
• MUHAMMAD AFTAB SULTAN v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF FINANCE 2014 PTD 1959

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2014 →

Pakistan, top advocate family court from Qalandarabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes