A. XLI, R 27 and O XVI, R 1 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), the applicants of section 42 were admits that they moved the petition to seek witnesses, but they were also on trial. And even the additional evidence for the petition was filed in the appellate court but it was not decided whose applications were decided by the courts below, the direct effect of the petitioner. On the merits of the matter, if there is a dispute, the parties should be provided with appropriate opportunities to present record evidence. The question of fact in this case involved the trial court and the appellate court first deciding the pending application before them and then proceeding to further the law, both courts violating the rights of the defendants and The decisions passed by the two courts could not be sustained and were set aside and the case was presented to the appellate court for a fresh verdict. ING both requests
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
