Find a Lawyer

MUSHARAF KHAN versus NAIMATULLAH

Comparison of Arts 59 and 84 Signatures The best evidence to prove the authenticity of the signatures would be that of a handwriting expert who inspected the documents signed with the signatures on the controversial documents or before the court case was still ongoing. Were signed. Until now, the trial court erred in filing a case that the defendant would benefit from these documents and the defendant did not have to prove that such an attack was against the requirements of the law because it was a solid step and No observations could be made in this regard. Without recording the evidence in this regard from any document, the comparison of the controversial signatures with any one of the parties was able to ascertain its origin but it was also not appropriate, considering the applicants at trial. The trial court order was placed with the order. Comparisons of the signatures were accepted in the circumstances after recording the evidence of the other party

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014

• GUL SAMBER KHAN v. SAYURAJ 2014 MLD 1753
• MUHAMMAD FIAZ v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1764
• QUDRAT SHAH v. Mst. NASEEM AKHTAR 2014 MLD 1777
• KHALIL AHMAD v. Mst. AZMAT ARA (Widow) 2014 YLR 1782
• Mst. SAADIA TABASSUM v. Malik MURTAZA 2014 YLR 1786
• ASIL ZADA v. BAEZZAT KHAN 2014 PCrLJ 1787
• ISLAM BADSHAH v. State 2014 MLD 1806
• HAZRAT ISA v. GUL AMIN 2014 MLD 1820

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2014 →

ask a advocate free from Hayatabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes