The burden of changing the sales statement for sale was dismissed by the trial court by a harassing woman, but the appellate court remanded it, where an uneducated, elderly, old woman of a Muslim was acquitted. Or if a woman's case was deprived of her property by sale, exchange, gift, inheritance, etc., then the beneficiary of the transaction would need to prove her truth. The beneficiary will need to prove with convincing proof of trust that the result of the free and independent advice of the person participating in the property was that the person was to be proved by the person accused of the crime but in the meantime In such circumstances as mere claim in the pleadings and evidence was sufficient to convict the defendant of their burden, in order to strengthen the sale exchange to defeat the claim of the plaintiff, it was stated in his favor It was important to strengthen that the witness did not appear in the box to prove the deviation and consider the sale The Tehsildar and the Patwari Circle were not presented to prove that it was ready and affirmed at the request of the plaintiff and that he had received a sale case. The minor was obliged to testify, but the defendant's son appeared in the witness box as his father's lawyer, but did not state that his father's attendance in the witness box did not indicate that at the time of the trial decision. While the trial court did not consider such facts, the appellate court rightly rejected this finding.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
