GOVERNMENT POLY TECHNICAL INSTITUTE (FEMALE) versus MUHAMMAD BAKHSH
The plaintiffs claiming to have occupied section 8 immovable property believed that the defendants had acquired 22 kanals of land but they had illegally added 7 marshals of land to their institute for which no The award was issued and no compensation was paid, and litigation was also decided. The defendants had initially acquired 22 kanal of land and had earlier stated that they had no other land in the same area or khata, nor did they acquire any additional land from the claimant or other owners of the institute. And its area was 22. The Kanal and 17 Marla defendants were in possession of more houses than their own (over 22 Kanal) for which they had no explanation. The local commissioner was no ordinary person, but being a Naib Tehsildar was an expert in this matter and There was no question. Instead of passing any wrong and wrong calculations in this area and passing it by the trial court, the defendants were ordered to pay their compensation to the landlord, who was ordered to seize more than 7 acres of land. There was a verdict and the price was fixed by the Supreme Court in the first phase of litigation. Both the courts below evaluated and appreciated the evidence. And the material on the record was found to have been properly and properly and the plaintiffs relieved. In the combined investigation of the two courts below, no illegal or weakening was maintained which was revised. Was excluded.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
