Section 24 Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition submitted to the plaintiff by the plaintiff was directed by the respondent to resubmit the harmless Som on the request of the respondent scope pre-emptor. The admission of the mutation within EAM time was not enough to stop the sale process, for which the Revenue Officer would have to certify by the court that the plaintiff should provide the appropriate time to submit the ZOM, but there was no discretion. Was not Permitting or needing / instructing / submitting the case for more than 30 days from the date of filing of the case was above thirty days and the maximum limit was not the time when the court had the power and authority to extend / extend it. This was fixed by the source. Unless otherwise provided, there is no restriction for an extension of time that was set by the court in its sole discretion, i.e. submitting the gold sum within 30 days. S was the command of the law where the court failed to specify the time, then it should be considered that the plaintiff was allowed a full period of 30 days to make the payment. Was bound by The suit was filed on 25th 2009 and on the same date the Emperor was directed to submit one-third of the consideration which he had mentioned to the plaintiff in the statement dated 16.5.2009. But he did not object to the amount / consideration with which he had purchased the suit property and on the direction of the court, the amount of Zar Saum Som was deposited by the pre-emptor to the defendant. First
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
