Section 561A, 169 and 173 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 337F (Iiv), 452, 148 and 149 of the cause of the modus operandi, terminate the police action after preparation of domestic plea, injury, assault or imprisonment. Doing this, the investigating officer for the petitioner requested the applicant / complainant to terminate the police action, whereby the respondent / suspect was released; released or discharged; and the accused's name was removed from the invoice. Was given / excluded. In the FIR, the accused was directly charged for pushing the complainant and his wife was to determine the role and criminal liability of the trial court accused, after recording the evidence, the investigating officer or the police officer in charge, Was granted authority under Section 169, CR PC, to release an accused on bail by obtaining his personal acquittal if it was found that the evidence against the accused was scarce, or the accused's relationship with the crime theme There is no reasonable basis for justifying this. Section 16969, CRPC, did not allow the investigating officer to examine the defense evidence of an accused. And to declare the accused's innocence, prefer it over the direct evidence collected by the prosecution In the present case, the same evidence was considered by the investigating officer, albeit albay. And on the strength of some affidavit the accused was released and released on bail rather than released, the police act was extremely regrettable, which no ground station house officer of his police station supervised. Regardless of the limits of its options. The nature of the accused in the case, the release of the accused
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
