GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR KHAN
A IX, R 13, O XXVII, R 1, OI, R 10 and Section 79 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Arts 164 and 181 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 8 suit, possession of immovable property Approval of the Government's previous party decree, a valid order for the dissolution of the previous Parliament Order was sought, if a 30-day period was set, if the summons had not been properly presented or the defendant would have If prevented from appearing, the former party decree will be set aside. From the same date or where the defendant learned of the decree was not properly presented, nor was the original report substantiated by the notice nor the statement of the judicial officer being presented to the trial court. Was posted by so that the facts of this service can be ascertained. The written statement submitted by the government pledger was not endorsed by anyone who is legally authorized by the government or the defendants. Any request from the Government on behalf of the Government may be signed and verified. In the present case, the provincial government was not made a party to the suit, the government did not approve the defense of the case through proper notification, the government's lawyer was not authorized to present a written statement on behalf of the defendants. Such requests were not signed or verified by a special public player. The powers expressed by the relevant Government should not be treated by the Government decision, any property owned by the Provincial or Central Government or any order passed in respect of ownership as a party to it or The decree should not be inappropriate.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
