Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O XVIII, R 1 & O XII, R 6 Convention Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 113 Suite on the basis of failure to make an entry limitation decision for the specific performance of the contract Was dismissed by the plaintiff claiming that the plaintiff was not examined by the plaintiff for one of the defendants to justify the payment of the contract execution and the sale consideration. Consideration of the sale was not proved that the plaintiff remained silent for long. Period and its case was out of bounds The sales contract could not be relied on without any proof of sale. The alleged sale was made through an unregistered document that required solid evidence but did not present such evidence. That the order should have been approved. To the extent of the defendant who acknowledged the claim of the plaintiff, there is no problem between the plaintiff and those who accepted his claim. The plaintiff was not obliged to include evidence against the defendant who admitted his claim. The court has the power to issue an injunction at any stage where the admission of facts was either made in the claim or otherwise which admitted the facts. What was not required to be made were the decisions and decisions of the courts below. The extent of the defendant was amended, which acknowledged the claim of the plaintiff, and the decree was approved to the extent that it was retained to the extent of the remaining defendants.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
