Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O VI, R 4 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Declaration of Gift of Mutual Claim 42 The plaintiff's claim that the donor did not make the gift and so on Was the result of The fraud committed by the executors was rejected at the same time, but none of the claimant's legal heirs had received the gift nor came to support his claim. The party has alleged that there is no evidence of fraudulent cases and procedures. Such an effect was presented that both the gift-changers' right were also minor at the time of its confirmation and unable to commit fraud. The plaintiff was obliged to provide proof of who committed the fraud. No explanation was provided as to what was or was not expected to be minor. The evidence that the defendant had with the suit property in this regard was not transferred to the occupant at the time of the gift but it was necessary to supply it. The supply of property in the case of minor deeds was not material as was the minor but was an important part of the gift. It was when the father gifted the property in favor of the minor son or was given a gift by the guardian to take possession of the father or guardian. Thereafter, the declaration of gift / minor delivery will resolve the lack of occupancy in the post-occupancy phase; in the case of minor and ward donor, the gift will not be invalidated. ? The property and variations were properly verified The gift can be made orally without the help of a device such as a registered one
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
