Sections 302 (b), 324, 427 and 34 Kital Ahmed, attempted murder, mischief, killing of commonwealth evidence and two witnesses were shot by four suspects, who were armed with a 7 rifle. ? 62 bore; the victim was shot, but the prosecution's two witnesses escaped, who, on his face, did not appear to the prudent mind, could only draw from the scene of the incident, was it That the witnesses were not present on the occasion Ocular's account was inconsistent with the medical evidence and that the evidence of the two witnesses was denied by medical evidence The prosecution could not prove its version with regard to the motive. Used to be known and its benefit sank into mystery. In which, it must necessarily go to the complainant and the other witness who presented the ocular account, but on the material points they were inconsistent with each other, both said witnesses made some improvement in their judicial statements. Is brought. Section 242424, was filed in the PPCFIR, but the trial court acquitted the accused from the charge, which would mean that the trial court was not sure of his presence, saying the two The presence of eyewitnesses, it seems suspicious, was set aside, the accused was acquitted of the charges under Sections 302 (b), 424, 427 and 34, PPC, and was set at liberty. Was
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
